|
From:
xxxx
Sent: 06 July 2015 10:22 AM
To: 'Michael'; MusaMa@legal-aid.co.za
Cc: nameandshamebiz@gmail.com;
sandtonbusiness@gmail.com
Subject: RE: Names of the two people &
Letter required from Legal Aid Board.
Legal Aid Board.
We need the names
of the two people that you mentioned in Court
who have decided not to Comply with the
Constitution, in granting legal Aid.
You still have e
not forwarded the Letter which we need for Court
Purposes.
Yours Faithfully,
xxxx.
From:
xxxx
Sent: 23 June 2015 11:32 AM
To: 'Michael'; 'MusaMa@legal-aid.co.za'
Cc: 'nameandshamebiz@gmail.com'; 'sandtonbusiness@gmail.com'
Subject: Letter required from Legal Aid
Board.
Hi Musa,
We require a letter
from the Legal Aid board, confirming that they
not will comply with the Constitution of South
Africa, and provide Professional Legal
Representation, and fund it in terms of the
Act.
Based on the email
below, and your advice to the Court today, we
confirm that you will no longer represent me .
You failed to
comply to any of the Legal Aid guide lines.
Quote’’
2.
Duty to Protect the Interests of the Client
2.1
The primary duty of a professional employee is
to protect the interests of the client so far as
consistent with any duties owed to the court and
any other rules of professional conduct. Subject
to this, a professional employee shall do his or
her utmost to promote and work for the best
interests of the client and to ensure that the
client receives a fair hearing. A professional
employee shall provide the client with fearless,
vigorous and effective defence and may use all
proper and lawful means to secure the best
outcome for the client.
2.2
A professional employee shall not put a client
under pressure to plead guilty, and in
particular, shall not advise a client that it is
in his or her interests to plead guilty unless
satisfied that the prosecution is able to
discharge the burden of proof.
3.
Duty to Act with Integrity and Independence
3.1
An employee shall act with honesty and integrity
in carrying out his or her duties on behalf of
the salaried service. He or she must never
knowingly or recklessly give false or misleading
information.
3.2
A professional employee has a duty to maintain
his or her professional independence and not to
allow this to be compromised by prosecuting
authorities, the courts, Legal Aid SA, clients
or any other source.
4.
Duty to act Impartially and to avoid
Discrimination
4.1
Employees shall treat clients fairly, reasonably
and without discrimination. In carrying out this
duty, an employee must not discriminate directly
or indirect
Unquote
From:
Michael [mailto:mikehoskingesq@gmail.com]
Sent: 17 June 2015 09:55 AM
To: 'MusaMa@legal-aid.co.za'
Cc: 'nameandshamebiz@gmail.com'; 'sandtonbusiness@gmail.com'
Subject: My Attorney - Duties of an
Attorney.
We require you to ask for a postponement on
Tuesday, as I require the Legal Aid Board to
Appoint a Professional Advocate paid for by the
Legal Aid Board, and Chosen by me to continue
the case and do massive Damage Control.
Dear Musa,
I write to you officially as you are my
attorney.
It is of grave concern to me as your Client,
that you are treating me with gross contempt,.
You were appointed by the Court to represent me
in Court.
As a South African Citizen, fully complying with
the rules of legal aid, and in terms of the
Constitution, I am entitled to Professional
Legal representation.
Sadly, you have Compromised your position as a
defence attorney by aligning your self with the
corrupt actions of the Prosecutor.
You don’t seem to have grasped the case and
when I try to give you the facts you attack me
in writing.
Your representation in Court last Tuesday was
appalling, in that half way through my
Testimony, you went completely blank, and failed
to complete the sequence of events.
The Prosecutor then fabricated a story about
Rudy Castleman, I had to correct her, and you
and the Magistrate failed to take exception to
it to her or rule on a point of order.
Your cross examination of the complainant and
witness was appalling, in that you did not ask
them any Questions, or destroy them, clearly to
avoid embarrassing the Corrupt Prosecutor.
By way of example, I am attaching the list of
Questions I had prepared, and you told me the
Magistrate does not like long interrogation of
witnesses.
The Four State Witnesses which were called by
the state,
Mr Ricky Mannie.
Mr Rudi
Castlemann,
Mr Robert Laubscher and
Mr Colin Jacobs
are not known to me, I have never met them
before, I have never Communicated with any of
them in any way, in written format or by
Telephone, or by email.
You failed to Cross Examine them Professionally
and in detail.
It is important that the Prosecution and
the defence attorney understands this, as
it is it is seriously interfering with my case,
and causing problems with my defence attorney.
The web site Name and Shame is not owned
by me, and is Registered in the USA. The
web site is owned and maintained by N & S GROUP
Scottsdale, Arizona USA, and is registered to
GoDaddy.com one of the biggest IT Companies in
the World.
Because of the Limited Commercial experience of
the Prosecutor, and my own Attorney, the
prosecutor of the Court and the Magistrate keeps
stating that I own N & S and that I published
remarks on the nameandshame.biz web site in the
USA.
The South African Courts, both Lower and Higher
have no Jurisdiction over a Company Registered
and owned by an American Company in the USA, and
what they publish.
It is like a Newspaper that reports Criminal
activities and Unethical Practices. However it
Publishes documents if it can get them. You
could call it the ‘’ Credit Bureau’’ and records
information against people and Companies.
They have already reported major Corruption in
the NPA and the South African Courts, and the
South African Police.
You also have Hello Peter, Nose Week, M & G ,
Frankfurter and I can give you a list of 20
others who publish stories.
Mr Mannie was the only person who broke into
our house. He was on his own, so therefore how
can the Prosecution have any Witnesses, except
the ones who have made statements in Affidavits
that no shots were fired, which are missing from
the Docket.
Mr Ricky Mannie
is the Complainant and the only witness.
But Mr Mannie spent 90 % of his time making
false statements against me and producing
documents from the nameandshame.biz website in
Court and nobody stopped him . These statements
were not relevant to the ‘’alleged’’ shooting.
He gave massive conflicting statements about
himself on Dates, firearms, who he worked for,
and you did not ask the Magistrate to take
action on him.
Mr Rudy Castlemann
is from Tim Risk Management and has no knowledge
of the ‘alleged ’ shooting as he was not there !
Mr Rudy Castlemann is not known to me, was not a
witness to the ‘alleged’ shooting, has never
spoken to me, has never communicated with me and
I have never Communicated with him.
Why was he called as a Witness? Why did you not
listen to me and destroy him as a witness?
However you got him to confess that Mr Mannie
was lying about taking him back to Mercedes
Benz, and confessing to receiving an email from
Mr Robert Andre Laubscher of Strauss Daly, which
is great, but why did they call him? Why did
you not fully interrogate him and destroy him as
a witness?
Mr Laubscher of Strauss Daly is not known to me and I have never
met him.. He was not a witness to the alleged
shooting, has never spoken to me and has never
communicated with me, and I have never
Communicated with him. We know that he drew up
the Affidavit which Mr Mannie signed, and paid
the police.
You have always stated that I must stay focused
on the Charges against me, but Mr Mannie spent
90 % of his time making false statements against
me, which were not relevant to the alleged
shooting. Why did you not destroy him as a
witness? It was clear you were protecting the
Prosecutor.
Mr Colin Jacobs
is not known to me and I have never met him.. He
was not a witness to the ’alleged’ shooting, has
never spoken to me and has never communicated
with me, and I have never Communicated with
him. He is an out of work Post Office Telephone
Installer, who was paid by Mr Laubscher.
We require you to ask for a postponement on
Tuesday, as I require the Legal Aid Board to
Appoint a Professional Advocate paid for by the
Board, and Chosen by me to continue the case and
do massive Damage Control.
The prosecutor is to Produce all the Evidence
she has concealed from the Court, which confirms
that no shooting took place.
The prosecutor is to produce responses to your
Representations, and the representations you
made. There is no Privilege.
That all the Witnesses are to be recalled so
that they can be professionally interrogated.
That charges of Perjury are filed against the
Complainant, and a warrant for his arrest is
issued, by the Court.
The Affidavit from Robert Laubscher is Produced,
and Perjury Charges are filed.
That the Court bring charges against the
Prosecutor and the investigation officer. And
the ballistic expert for Concealing Evidence.
Alternatively ,
You can arrange with your Corrupt Prosecutor,
and to avoid major embarrassment to her and
yourself, for your Gross incompetence, and
knowingly concealing evidence, and her
corruption and knowingly concealing evidence,
that the State immediately drop the fabricated
charges, before pleadings take place.
We need this confirmation by 16:00 hours
on Thursday 18th June 2015,
failing which a full Document with all
attachments will be delivered to the Magistrate
on Friday.
THE FULL STORY WILL BE PUBLISHED ON FRIDAY.
Regards,
Michael
Ing.P.Eur. Michael D. Hosking B.Ing.
International Professional
Engineer
E.mail :
saprofeng@gmail.com
E.mail :PrEng@outlook.com
Tel (O) :+27 ( 0 ) 11 0500 540 Fiber Optic
Fax :+27 (0 ) 86 244 6148
Cell :+27 ( 0 ) 71 949 2968 W ) ( SMS
facility Disconnected because of abuse )
Web :
www.professionalengineers.biz
Web :
www.engineeringplacements.net
Private Number sendings and call centre numbers are not answered
for professional reasons

|