Shady Attorneys A - Z Listing

 

Listing

M

          

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

S

T

U

V

W

X

Y

Z

 

 

Mr Musa Mavasa Corrupt & Incompetent Defence Attorney - Alexandra Court & Randburg Court

Regional Court PA

(Attorney of the High Court)

C/o Alexandra Justice Centre

Legal Aid South Africa.

 

 

 

Matthew Morrison

director

corporate commercial

tel: +27 11 269 7600

cell: +27 83 640 1994

email: mmorrison@ENSafrica.com

150 West Street Sandton Johannesburg South Africa 2196

EDWARD NATHAN SONNEBERGS- Matthew Morrison Click to view

 

 

J.C.Marais

Advocate

Concourt takes ‘high-price’ counsel down a peg or two

THE Constitutional Court has spoken out about its “disquiet” over how counsel’s fees have “burgeoned in recent years”.

In a judgment handed down yesterday, the 11 justices of the Concourt slashed the amounts a senior advocate and his junior could charge one of their clients.

The judgment deals only with legal costs, which relates to a leave to appeal application that was heard before their court two years ago. The original dispute, however, stems from a lengthy legal clash over a sea view in Camps Bay.

It was effectively a bid by Camps Bay resident Anthony “Buddy” Herman to prevent his neighbour, Gerda Harrison, from building a three-storey house that would interfere with his view. However, Herman lost the battle. In November, 2010, the Concourt denied leave to appeal against a high court ruling and ordered the applicants – the Camps Bay Ratepayers’ and Residents’ Association and PS Booksellers – to pay the respondents’ legal costs for the application.

But Herman, who is also an attorney and represents the applicants, said they objected to the legal costs for Harrison’s two counsel. According to the 2010 Concourt judgment, the advocates representing Harrison were Henry Viljoen, SC, and JC Marais.

They originally charged R453 150 and R263 500 respectively. Following the applicants’ objection, however, the court’s taxing master had cut this down by almost half to R240 000 for Viljoen and R160 000 for Marais.

The losing party, in this case the applicants, were still not happy and sought a review of the taxing master’s decision, which gave rise to yesterday’s Concourt judgment.

The justices found that the amount awarded was “so disproportionate to what is fair and reasonable” that it had to be set aside. They again slashed the legal fees, this time to R180 000 for Viljoen and R120 000 for Marais.

“We feel obliged to express our disquiet at how counsel’s fees have burgeoned in recent years.

“To say that they have skyrocketed is no loose metaphor,” the judgment read.

“No matter the complexity of the issue, we can find no justification, in a country where disparities are gross and poverty is rife, to countenance appellate advocates charging hundreds of thousands of rands to argue an appeal.”

The justices also tipped their hats at the many “accomplished and hardworking” advocates who took on cases pro bono and charged special rates for indigent clients.

 Source : Thug Watch

 

MS June Marks of June Marks Attorneys

 

MS June Marks of June Marks Attorneys

June Marks

 

 

Source : Thugwatch  

 
 

George Michaelides - - Bedfordview  

 

 

 

Daniel Mogagbe - Advocate

 

 

Legal threats over debts 'empty'

Firm of attorneys 'unlikely to issue summons and incur costs'

May 09, 2008 Edition 1

Don't panic if it feels like you are being bombarded by letters of demand or text messages from

attorneys Munnik Basson DaGama Inc, threatening you with action for a debt you do not owe.

Chances are remote that they will issue summons, say attorneys Argus Action approached after

Barbara Hart of Cape Town complained that she was getting nowhere trying to convince Munnik

Basson DaGama that she did not owe a debt that grew with every demand they sent.

The firm of attorneys did not respond to Argus Action's request for comment.

Hart is reluctant to give her ID number to prove to them that they are hounding the wrong person.

"I don't trust them. And in this age of identity theft, we are cautioned not to give our personal

details to strangers," she said.

The onus is on the attorneys or debt collectors to prove the identity of the debtor, says

Johannesburg attorney Stephen Logan.

It was likely that Munnik Basson DaGama had bought a debtors' book from the retail chain store

in question, and was now trying to trace unpaid debts, said Logan.

But the debt, dating back to 2001, was prescribed (lapsed).

If Hart gave her identity number to Munnik Basson DaGama, they would have evidence that she

was the wrong person, as they had the ID number of the actual debtor.

"Munnik Basson DaGama will close the file in two seconds if they get proof that she's not the

person."

Hart complained that the demands contained no information about the so-called debt.

Her repeated phone calls to Munnik Basson DaGama's call centre in Johannesburg, and a letter

she wrote explaining that she was not the debtor they sought, had made no impression. The

letters of demand continued to arrive.

Logan said Hart could complain to the Law Society, as the demands were from a firm of

attorneys, over whom the Council for Debt Collectors had no jurisdiction.

Cape Town attorney Malcolm Roup said Munnik Basson DaGama had SMSed a final demand to

him.

"The SMS said if I did not phone their number, action would follow. I didn't owe money and did

not know what they were talking about."

He had phoned, but could not get through to the call centre.

"My advice is to not co-operate with them. Most of their stuff is just letters and threats. The

chances are they are not going to issue summons. They are not going to incur costs," said Roup.

Their approach was not correct. "They must give debtors more particulars. They must set out the

cause of the debt."

Another lawyer, who asked not to be named, said Hart could ignore the demands once she had

set the necessary safeguards in place.

"Invite them to issue summons, and provide an address so that they do not use the wrong one.

"If you tell them you dispute the claim, they also cannot list you at a credit bureau."

We investigate consumers' complaints, highlight issues affecting consumers and call businesses

to account. Contact us at Box 56, Cape Town, 8000; on 021 488 4791; or e-mail

maureen.marud@inl.co.za

 
 
 

Munnik Basson Dagama Inc. Attorneys 342 Jan Smuts Avenue,

Hyse Park 2186

This is the most dishonest and unethical firm of Attorneys

 

Their clients are : MultiChoice( Pty ) Ltd,

Edgars Stores Ltd

Woolworths

SABC

 

 

See Report under SABC as well

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Disclaimer : Name and Shame.Biz  website contains external links to other websites.
These external links are provided solely for the information of the users of 
Name and Shame.Biz website.
Name and Shame.Biz  and is not responsible for the content of such other websites."

Copyright © 2000 Owned and maintained by CISGROUP USA.

Registered in Arizona USA